India’s Proposed New Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) Framework [Prelims Bits]

02 Sep 2026

Tags: Prelims   Economic and Social Development

Source: The Hindu

Context: India is considering a re-modelling of its BIT framework, including a narrowly defined qualified Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) provision to balance investor protection with India’s regulatory interests.

  • Qualified MFN: May give foreign investors specified additional benefits available under India’s other treaties, but does not permit broad claims based on third-country treaties.
  • MFN rule: India’s 2015 Model BIT removed the earlier open-ended MFN approach.
  • Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Proposed domestic litigation window may be reduced from 5 years → 1 year.
  • Post-BIT protection: Proposed to increase from 5 years → 10 years after treaty termination/expiry.
  • Definition of investment: Proposed to expand to include portfolio investments and other financial assets.
  • Third-party litigation funding: Proposed to be prohibited.
  • Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): The open-ended FET standard of the earlier framework will not be restored.
  • MFN principle: Generally requires a country to accord investors/trading partners treatment no less favourable than that given to comparable investors/partners from another country. A qualified MFN limits this obligation to specifically defined circumstances.

Prelims Question

Q1. With reference to Iceland's relationship with European institutions, which one of the following statements is correct?

(a) Iceland is a member of the European Union but has opted out of the Common Fisheries Policy.

(b) Iceland is neither a member of the European Union nor a member of the Schengen Area.

(c) Iceland is a NATO member and participates in the EEA and Schengen frameworks despite remaining outside the European Union.

(d) Iceland's participation in the European Economic Area automatically makes it a member of the European Union.

Answer: (c)

Explanation: Iceland has a distinctive position: it is outside the EU, but is a member of NATO, EEA and Schengen. Its fisheries sector is particularly sensitive because maintaining national control over fisheries has been an important consideration in the EU membership debate.