Why is Buxa Bringing Tigers Back?

07 Oct 2026

Tags: Environment   Conservation   Protection frameworks

Source: The Hindu

Context: On October 2, three-year-old tigress T138 was released into Buxa Tiger Reserve (BTR), West Bengal, beginning a phased programme to establish a viable, self-sustaining tiger population.

  • Three more tigers are likely to be introduced subsequently.
  • T138 was translocated from Valmiki Tiger Reserve (VTR), Bihar.
  • The objective is not merely to increase tiger numbers but to create conditions for breeding and establishment of a self-sustaining population.

How Will the Reintroduction Take Place?

  • Initially, T138 will remain in an approximately 2.3-hectare enclosure to acclimatise to the new environment.
  • She will subsequently be released into the wider reserve after adaptation.
  • Post-release monitoring will combine telemetry, camera trapping and field-based monitoring.
  • These methods will track the tiger’s movement, behaviour, health and adaptation to the new habitat.

Why is Buxa Suitable?

  • Buxa was declared a Tiger Reserve in 1983 and is India's 15th tiger reserve.
  • It covers approximately 760.87 sq. km, extending about 50 km east–west and 35 km north–south.
  • Its location provides important transboundary and landscape-level connectivity:
    • North: Forests of Bhutan.
    • East: Kochugaon forests and Manas Tiger Reserve.
    • West:Jaldapara National Park.
  • Such connectivity can facilitate movement of wildlife and potentially support long-term tiger population recovery.
  • However, habitat degradation, fragmentation, changing land use and declining prey availability have weakened conditions for maintaining a resident tiger population.

Why Was Valmiki Tiger Reserve Chosen?

  • The National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) identified Buxa, Dampa and Palamu among reserves requiring tiger reintroduction efforts.
  • A reintroduction programme initiated in 2018 subsequently led to the Buxa initiative.
  • Scientists sought a source population occupying a habitat ecologically comparable to Buxa.
  • Valmiki Tiger Reserve, located in the eastern part of the Terai Arc Landscape, was considered suitable because of similarities in terrain and ecological conditions.
  • Tigers from the Sundarbans were not preferred because the Sundarbans' unique mangrove ecosystem differs substantially from Buxa's terrain and habitat.
  • The Indian Sundarbans supports around 100 tigers, making it an important tiger landscape but not necessarily an appropriate source for Buxa.

What Does “Tiger Reintroduction” Mean?

  • In the Indian context, tiger reintroduction means establishing a tiger population in a part of the species' historical range from which it has become locally extinct.
  • It differs from simply releasing individual animals because the ultimate objective is establishment of a breeding and self-sustaining population.
  • India describes its tiger-reintroduction programme as the first scientific endeavour of its kind globally.

India's Experience with Tiger Reintroduction

  • India began major scientific tiger reintroduction efforts in 2008, notably in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, and Panna Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh.
  • The programme has subsequently been undertaken across 12 tiger reserves.
  • It involves collaboration between the NTCA, State governments and Wildlife Institute of India (WII).
  • Tiger numbers have increased in several reserves where reintroduction has been undertaken.
  • However, outcomes have not been uniform across all landscapes.

Example: Satkosia

  • Reintroduction in Satkosia Tiger Reserve, Odisha, encountered difficulties in tiger adaptation.
  • Human–tiger conflict, including livestock depredation, generated negative local responses.
  • This demonstrates that successful reintroduction depends not only on habitat suitability but also on prey availability, social acceptance and conflict management.

NTCA Protocol for Tiger Reintroduction

  • Learning from earlier experiences, the NTCA has developed a dedicated tiger reintroduction protocol.
  • It covers:
    • Objectives and institutional arrangements.
    • Pre-project activities and feasibility assessment.
    • Site selection and evaluation.
    • Suitability of the source/release tigers.
    • Socio-economic requirements.
    • Preparations for release.
    • Post-release monitoring and management.
  • The protocol reflects the shift from animal release to scientifically planned population recovery.

Challenges at Buxa

  • Buxa has lacked a stable resident tiger population for several years, although occasional tigers have been recorded, particularly during winter.
  • The reserve contains settlements and is surrounded by revenue villages and tea estates, increasing the possibility of human–tiger interactions.
  • Around 300 families are being relocated by the State government to facilitate the reintroduction programme.
  • Linear infrastructure, including a railway line, poses major threats to wildlife movement; elephants in the region have suffered significant mortality.
  • Heavy commercial traffic on the road connecting Bhutan and West Bengal through Buxa adds another potential disturbance and wildlife-movement risk.
  • Habitat fragmentation, prey availability and human pressure will therefore determine whether the introduced tigers can establish a viable population.

Can Buxa Sustain a Tiger Population?

  • Buxa's large area and connectivity with Bhutan, Manas and Jaldapara provide important ecological advantages.
  • However, geographical size alone does not guarantee tiger recovery.
  • Long-term success will depend on adequate prey base, habitat quality, ecological connectivity, control of human disturbance and effective conflict management.
  • The relocation of families and management of roads and railway infrastructure are therefore integral to the programme rather than peripheral measures.

Important Institutions

  • National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA): Statutory body under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, as amended in 2006; responsible for strengthening tiger conservation and implementing Project Tiger.
  • Wildlife Institute of India (WII): Autonomous institution under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC); undertakes research, training, monitoring and technical support for wildlife conservation.
  • Project Tiger: Centrally Sponsored Scheme launched in 1973 to conserve tigers and their habitats through designated tiger reserves and landscape-level management.

Terai Arc Landscape

  • The Terai Arc Landscape (TAL) extends across the lowland Terai region of India and Nepal.
  • It comprises interconnected forests, grasslands and protected areas that support species such as tigers, elephants and rhinoceroses.
  • Maintaining connectivity across such landscapes is important because isolated protected areas may not provide sufficient space for viable wildlife populations.
  • Buxa's connectivity with Bhutan and neighbouring protected areas therefore gives the reintroduction programme significance beyond the boundaries of the tiger reserve.

Prelims Question

Q1. With reference to tiger reintroduction in India, consider the following statements:

  1. Tiger reintroduction aims at establishing a breeding and self-sustaining population in an area within the species' historical range where it has become locally extinct.
  2. Selection of a source population for reintroduction may take into account ecological similarity between the source and release landscapes.
  3. The success of reintroduction can be assessed solely by whether the released animals survive after their release.
  4. Ecological connectivity with neighbouring habitats can be important for supporting the long-term viability of a reintroduced tiger population.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1, 2 and 4 only
(c) 2, 3 and 4 only
(d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Answer: (b) 

Explanation:

  • Statement 1 is correct: Reintroduction is aimed at restoring a population in a part of its historical range from which it has disappeared locally; the ultimate objective is a self-sustaining population.
  • Statement 2 is correct: The choice of Valmiki over the Sundarbans illustrates the importance of ecological compatibility between source and release landscapes.
  • Statement 3 is incorrect: Survival of individual released animals is not sufficient. Breeding, prey availability, habitat quality, social acceptance and long-term population viability are also important.
  • Statement 4 is correct: Connectivity with Bhutan, Manas and Jaldapara can facilitate movement and improve long-term ecological viability.