Green Energy Transition: Removing Transmission and Storage Bottlenecks

03 Oct 2026

Tags: Economy   Infrastructure   Energy Sector

Source: The Indian Express

Context: India has crossed 300 GW of installed renewable-energy capacity and ranks among the world's leading renewable-energy deployers, but rapid capacity addition has not always translated into electricity availability during peak-demand periods, particularly evenings.

  • Transmission constraints have resulted in curtailment of renewable power, highlighting that generation capacity alone is insufficient for a reliable green-energy transition.
  • The newly approved Green Energy Corridor Phase-III (GEC-III) seeks to address these bottlenecks by strengthening intra-state transmission and adding large-scale battery storage.

Green Energy Corridor Phase-III

  • The Union Cabinet approved GEC-III on 30 September 2026, with a total outlay of ₹1,86,405 crore, targeted for completion by FY 2032–33.
  • The scheme aims to facilitate evacuation of up to 135 GW of renewable energy across States/UTs by strengthening the Intra-State Transmission System (InSTS).
  • ₹1,36,378 crore is earmarked for intra-state transmission infrastructure, while ₹50,000 crore is allocated for 50 GWh of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS).
  • The Centre will provide ₹54,082 crore in Central Financial Support, partly helping offset intra-state transmission charges and thereby contain the cost burden on consumers.

Why Transmission Is a Major Bottleneck

  • Renewable generation is often concentrated in resource-rich regions, while electricity demand is distributed across cities, industries and rural areas.
  • Transmission congestion can prevent electricity generated by solar and wind projects from reaching consumers, resulting in curtailment even when generation capacity is available.
  • Strengthening the intra-state “last-mile” transmission network is therefore crucial for converting installed renewable capacity into usable electricity.
  • This is particularly important during evening peak demand, when solar generation falls sharply while electricity demand may remain high.

Renewable Energy and the Storage Challenge

  • Solar and wind power are variable/intermittent sources: solar generation depends on sunlight, while wind generation varies with wind conditions.
  • This creates a mismatch between when electricity is generated and when consumers need it.
  • GEC-III's 50 GWh BESS component is designed to improve grid flexibility, address intermittency and congestion, reduce peak-hour curtailment and help meet demand during non-solar hours.
  • This is the first GEC phase with a dedicated battery-storage component, marking a shift from focusing mainly on transmission infrastructure towards integrated transmission + storage planning.

Implementation Challenges

Land and Right-of-Way Issues

  • Construction of high-voltage transmission lines requires Right of Way (RoW) across private and public land.
  • Compensation to landowners and land acquisition disputes can delay projects.
  • Environmental and other statutory clearances can also create significant delays, indicating that the challenge is not merely availability of investment but project execution and coordination.

Making Battery Storage Viable

  • The success of the 50 GWh storage target depends on creating viable business models and appropriate incentives for battery projects.
  • India also needs clear rules regarding ownership, utilisation and payment for stored electricity.
  • Dependence on imported critical battery raw materials makes domestic manufacturing, recycling and supply-chain resilience important for long-term storage deployment.

Need for Better Institutional Coordination

  • Renewable-energy generation, transmission networks and electricity demand do not necessarily correspond to administrative boundaries.
  • Fragmented decision-making among multiple Central and State authorities can delay transmission projects.
  • A single-window/unified portal bringing relevant approving authorities together could facilitate real-time monitoring, faster clearances and coordinated decision-making.
  • Greater coordination between the Centre, States, transmission utilities, regulators and project developers will therefore be essential.

Lessons from Earlier Phases

  • Experience from earlier Green Energy Corridor phases indicates that simply allocating funds does not guarantee timely project completion.
  • Land acquisition, RoW compensation, environmental clearances, inter-agency coordination and project execution can become binding constraints.
  • GEC-III therefore needs stronger implementation mechanisms alongside financial support.

Relevant Concepts

Green Energy Corridor

  • A transmission-infrastructure programme designed to facilitate integration and evacuation of renewable electricity into the power grid.
  • Earlier phases focused primarily on strengthening inter-state and intra-state transmission networks in renewable-energy-rich regions.
  • GEC-III places particular emphasis on intra-state transmission and integrates BESS into the programme.

Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)

  • BESS stores electricity when supply is relatively high and makes it available when required.
  • It can help manage intermittency, peak demand, grid congestion, frequency/voltage stability and renewable-power curtailment.
  • Storage is therefore an important component of a power system with a rising share of variable renewable energy.

Intra-State Transmission System (InSTS)

  • Refers to transmission infrastructure within a State/UT, connecting renewable-generation locations with demand centres and the wider grid.
  • GEC-III specifically seeks to strengthen this layer so that renewable power can be effectively evacuated and distributed.

Way Forward

  • Transmission must precede or keep pace with renewable-capacity addition to prevent generation assets from becoming stranded or curtailed.
  • Planning should integrate renewable generation + transmission + storage + demand rather than treating them as separate sectors.
  • Faster land/clearance processes, coordinated approvals, viable storage markets and stronger intra-state networks are essential.
  • Successful implementation of GEC-III can help India move from merely adding renewable capacity to reliably delivering renewable electricity to consumers.

Prelims Question

Q1. With reference to Green Energy Corridor Phase-III (GEC-III), consider the following statements:

  1. GEC-III seeks to strengthen the Intra-State Transmission System to facilitate evacuation of renewable energy.
  2. It includes a dedicated Battery Energy Storage System component intended to address the temporal mismatch between renewable generation and electricity demand.
  3. The entire financial outlay of GEC-III is intended for strengthening transmission infrastructure, with battery storage being supported separately under another scheme.
  4. The programme recognises that increasing installed renewable-generation capacity alone may not ensure reliable electricity supply during peak-demand periods.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) Only two
(b) Only three
(c) All four
(d) Only one

Answer: (b) 

Explanation:

  • Statement 1 is Correct: GEC-III specifically targets strengthening Intra-State Transmission System (InSTS) for renewable-energy evacuation.
  • Statement 2 is Correct: It incorporates 50 GWh of BESS, enabling storage of electricity generated when supply is available and its subsequent use during demand periods.
  • Statement 3 is Incorrect: Storage is an integral component of GEC-III, with ₹50,000 crore earmarked for 50 GWh of BESS.
  • Statement 4 is Correct: Transmission congestion and the intermittency of solar/wind mean that installed capacity does not automatically translate into deliverable electricity at the required time.

Mains Question

Q. “India’s green-energy transition is increasingly constrained not by renewable-energy generation capacity, but by weaknesses in transmission and energy storage.” In this context, examine the significance of the Green Energy Corridor Phase-III (GEC-III) and discuss the key challenges in its effective implementation.

Approach

Introduction

  • Mention India’s rapid growth in renewable-energy capacity and the emerging generation–availability gap, particularly during peak/evening demand.
  • Establish that reliable energy transition requires an integrated generation–transmission–storage ecosystem.

Body

1. Significance of GEC-III

  • 135 GW evacuation capacity through strengthened Intra-State Transmission System.
  • 50 GWh BESS to address renewable intermittency and evening peak demand.
  • Reduces renewable curtailment and transmission congestion.
  • Central Financial Support can moderate transmission costs.
  • Marks a shift from capacity addition towards reliable renewable-power delivery.

2. Key implementation challenges

  • Land acquisition & RoW: compensation disputes and delays.
  • Clearances: environmental and other statutory approvals.
  • Storage viability: business models, ownership, utilisation and payment mechanisms.
  • Critical-mineral dependence: battery supply-chain vulnerabilities and need for recycling/domestic manufacturing.
  • Institutional fragmentation: Centre–State–utility–regulator coordination.
  • Lessons from earlier phases show that funding alone does not ensure timely execution.

3. Way Forward

  • Adopt integrated generation + transmission + storage + demand planning.
  • Establish single-window clearance and real-time project monitoring.
  • Develop viable storage markets and appropriate regulatory frameworks.
  • Strengthen domestic battery manufacturing, recycling and critical-mineral security.
  • Ensure transmission capacity keeps pace with renewable-capacity addition.

Conclusion

  • GEC-III should be viewed not merely as a transmission programme but as an enabler of grid flexibility and energy reliability. Its effective implementation can help India move from “renewable capacity creation” to “reliable renewable electricity delivery”, strengthening the country's broader net-zero and energy-security objectives.