United Nations at 81: Need for Reform and Multilateralism

27 Sep 2026

Tags: International Relations   Groupings   Global agreements

Source: The Hindu

Context: The 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) assumes greater significance as UN Secretary-General António Guterres enters his final UNGA session after a tenure marked by conflicts, pandemics, climate disasters and the emergence of risks from Artificial Intelligence (AI).

  • The article argues that the UN, at 81, faces a crisis of effectiveness, representativeness and legitimacy, requiring institutional reform and a move away from superpower dominance.

Growing Global Conflicts and UN’s Weakening

  • The present period has witnessed an unusually high level of armed conflict; one study recorded more than 65 conflicts across 35 countries in 2025, reportedly the highest level since 1946.
  • Polarisation, great-power conflicts, nuclear threats and unilateral sanctions have weakened the capacity of the UN to build consensus and uphold collective security.
  • Wars involving major powers and actions allegedly inconsistent with the UN Charter have further challenged the credibility of the multilateral system.

Conduct at the 81st UNGA

  • The article notes that leaders central to conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza and the Persian Gulf did not offer adequate proposals for strengthening the international system.
  • U.S. President Donald Trump referred to the possible “annihilation” of Iran and defended U.S. actions in Venezuela; he also claimed a role in negotiating peace in several conflicts, including the 2025 India–Pakistan four-day war, a claim that India disputed.
  • Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian strongly criticised the U.S. and Israel, while the Russian President did not attend the session.
  • The U.S. denial of visas to the Palestinian delegation further highlighted the political divisions surrounding the UNGA.

Partnership for Multilateralism

  • An initiative led by the European Union and several other countries, and co-sponsored by India, seeks to establish a Partnership for Multilateralism (P4M) to promote cooperation beyond superpower hegemony.
  • However, the initiative received limited attention amid the intense geopolitical disagreements at the UNGA.

Significance for India

  • India has launched a campaign for a second two-year non-permanent term on the UN Security Council for 2028–29, making its engagement with the UN particularly significant.
  • India traditionally advocates a rules-based international order, respect for the UN Charter, diplomacy, dialogue and peaceful resolution of disputes.
  • The article argues that India's role as a balancing power is especially relevant amid growing geopolitical tensions.
  • Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decision to skip the UNGA address and associated multilateral meetings was therefore notable, particularly after India hosted the Delhi BRICS Summit.

UN Security Council and India

  • The UN Security Council (UNSC) has 15 members: five permanent members with veto power and ten non-permanent members elected by the UNGA for two-year terms.
  • The five permanent members are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.
  • India has repeatedly advocated UNSC reform, particularly expansion of permanent and non-permanent membership, arguing that the present structure does not adequately reflect contemporary global realities.

Way Forward: Reforming Multilateralism

  • Strengthen the representativeness and legitimacy of UN institutions by reflecting the changing distribution of global population, economic weight and geopolitical influence.
  • Reform decision-making mechanisms to reduce excessive dependence on great-power rivalry and veto politics.
  • Reinforce diplomacy, dialogue, international law and the UN Charter as mechanisms for managing conflicts.
  • Build broader coalitions such as P4M to preserve effective multilateral cooperation beyond traditional superpower competition.

Mains Question

Q. “The effectiveness and legitimacy of the United Nations are increasingly constrained by geopolitical rivalry, veto politics and inadequate representation of contemporary global realities.” In this context, examine the need for reforming the UN system and strengthening multilateralism, with particular reference to India’s role.
 (15 marks, 250 words)

Approach

Introduction

  • Mention the UN's foundational objective of maintaining international peace, security and cooperation.
  • Highlight the contemporary gap between its universal mandate and geopolitical realities, reflected in conflicts, polarisation and institutional deadlock.

Body

1. Challenges to the UN

  • Great-power rivalry and geopolitical polarisation.
  • Veto politics limiting collective action by the UNSC.
  • Under-representation of developing countries and emerging powers.
  • Weak enforcement of international law and UN Charter principles.
  • New transnational challenges — climate change, pandemics, AI and cyber threats — requiring coordinated responses.

2. Why UN reform is necessary

  • Improve representativeness and legitimacy of global institutions.
  • Make the UNSC more reflective of contemporary demographic, economic and geopolitical realities.
  • Strengthen conflict-prevention and diplomatic mechanisms.
  • Reduce excessive dependence on great-power consensus and encourage issue-based coalitions.
  • Revitalise rules-based multilateralism.

3. India’s role

  • India’s advocacy for UNSC expansion, including permanent representation for developing regions.
  • Commitment to dialogue, peaceful dispute resolution and the UN Charter.
  • Role as a bridge between developed and developing countries.
  • Support for broader multilateral platforms and coalitions such as BRICS and P4M.
  • Greater contribution through peacekeeping, development partnerships and global public goods.

Conclusion

  • Reform should not mean weakening the UN but making it more representative, effective and accountable.
  • India can contribute to a more inclusive, rules-based and multipolar multilateral order by combining strategic autonomy with constructive global engagement.