ORANGUTANS IN ODISHA: WILDLIFE TRADE & REPATRIATION [PRELIMS BITS]

19 Sep 2026

Tags: Prelims   Current events of national and international importance

Source: The Indian Express

Context: Five baby orangutans rescued in Balasore, Odisha raised questions over illegal exotic-pet trade and their possible repatriation to Indonesia.

  • Orangutan species: Bornean, Sumatran and Tapanuli; all are Critically Endangered and listed under CITES Appendix I.
  • Natural range: Indonesia and Malaysia; the Odisha animals are suspected to be Sumatran orangutans.
  • CITES:Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora; adopted in 1973, entered into force in 1975; India became a party in 1976.
  • CITES Appendices:
    • Appendix I: Species threatened with extinction; international commercial trade is generally prohibited, with limited permitted exceptions.
    • Appendix II: Species that may become threatened without trade regulation; regulated trade permitted.
    • Appendix III: Species protected in at least one country that seeks international cooperation to control trade.
  • CITES coverage: ~6,700 animal species across mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates.
  • India’s law: Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, amended in 2022 to strengthen alignment with CITES; CITES-listed species were incorporated into a dedicated Schedule.
  • Repatriation: Not automatically mandatory under CITES; authorities should consider the animal’s country of origin, welfare, conservation implications and feasibility.
  • If return is infeasible: Confiscated animals may be placed in a recognised zoo, rescue centre or other appropriate facility.
  • Exotic-pet trade: India has emerged not only as a transit route but also a destination market for exotic wildlife.
  • Major trafficking routes: Northeastern land borders with Bangladesh/Myanmar and major international airports including Chennai, Bengaluru and Mumbai.
  • CITES is not a ban on all wildlife trade: It establishes an international permit-and-regulation system to ensure trade is legal, sustainable and does not threaten species survival.
  • Key distinction: Country of export/origin ≠ necessarily natural range; determining the exact origin is crucial for wildlife repatriation.

Prelims Question

Q1. With reference to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), consider the following statements:

  1. Inclusion of a species in CITES Appendix I permits unrestricted international commercial trade provided the exporting country issues the necessary permit.
  2. CITES Appendix II includes species that may become threatened with extinction unless their international trade is regulated.
  3. A species can be listed in Appendix III only if it is already listed in Appendix I or Appendix II.
  4. CITES automatically requires every confiscated specimen of a listed species to be returned to the country constituting its natural range.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Answer: (b) 2 only

Explanation:

  • Statement 1 is Incorrect: Appendix I species are subject to the strictest controls, and international commercial trade is generally prohibited, subject to limited exceptions.
  • Statement 2 is Correct: Appendix II covers species that may become threatened unless international trade is regulated and controlled.
  • Statement 3 is Incorrect: Appendix III can include a species at the request of a country in which the species is protected; prior inclusion in Appendix I or II is not required.
  • Statement 4 is Incorrect: CITES does not automatically mandate repatriation. Authorities may consider origin, animal welfare, conservation implications and feasibility.