Why Flat Maps Cannot Accurately Depict Earth

09 Sep 2026

Tags: Geography   Physical Geography   Geomorphology

Source: The Indian Express

Context: The United Nations General Assembly has adopted a resolution supporting the 2018 Equal Earth map projection as an alternative to the widely used Mercator projection.

  • The resolution, led by Togo, was supported by 164 countries, including India; the U.S. voted against it and six countries abstained.
  • Since UN resolutions are not legally binding, actual adoption by governments, schools and organisations remains uncertain.
  • The debate highlights a basic problem of cartography: a three-dimensional Earth cannot be represented on a two-dimensional surface without some distortion.

Why Does Every Flat Map Distort Earth?

  • Earth is not a perfect sphere; its shape is affected by rotation, the Moon's gravitational influence, and irregularities caused by the distribution of continents and oceans.
  • Map projection is the mathematical transformation of Earth's three-dimensional surface onto a two-dimensional map.
  • Every projection involves trade-offs involving four major properties:
    • Area: Relative size of landmasses.
    • Shape: Actual outline and appearance of regions.
    • Distance: Actual distance between locations.
    • Direction: Correct compass bearing between locations.
  • Therefore, no single flat map can preserve all four properties simultaneously.

Major Types of Map Projections

Conformal Projections

  • Preserve angles and local shapes but distort area, particularly at higher latitudes.
  • Example: Mercator projection.
  • Best suited for: Navigation, because compass directions can be represented accurately.

Equal-Area Projections

  • Preserve the relative area of landmasses but may distort their shape and distance.
  • Example: Equal Earth projection.
  • Best suited for: Population density, climate, land-use and other thematic/statistical maps.

Equidistant Projections

  • Preserve distance accurately from particular reference points or along specific lines.
  • Useful where accurate distance measurement is the primary requirement.

Compromise Projections

  • Do not preserve any one property perfectly but balance distortions of area, shape, distance and direction.
  • Examples: Robinson and Winkel Tripel projections.
  • Best suited for: General-purpose world maps.

Azimuthal/Planar Projections

  • Project Earth onto a flat plane from a central point.
  • Particularly useful for polar regions and certain flight-distance or directional studies.

Mercator Projection: Purpose and Features

  • Developed by Gerardus Mercator, a Flemish geographer and cartographer, in 1569, primarily to assist sailors with navigation.
  • It is a conformal cylindrical projection, where Earth's surface is conceptually projected onto a cylinder.
  • A constant compass direction appears as a straight line, allowing navigators to maintain a fixed bearing.
  • For example, a straight route between Mumbai and Muscat on a Mercator map can represent a constant compass direction.

Why Does Mercator Distort Size?

  • On the Mercator projection, meridians and parallels intersect at right angles, while the spacing of parallels increases towards the poles.
  • This preserves local shapes and angles but causes progressive inflation of land areas away from the equator.
  • Consequently, regions such as Greenland and Antarctica appear disproportionately large compared with equatorial regions.
  • Africa, for example, may appear comparable in size to Greenland, even though Africa is about 14 times larger.

The Colonial Criticism of Mercator

  • Mercator was designed primarily for navigation, not for accurately comparing the sizes of continents.
  • However, its widespread use has been criticised for creating a Western-centric visual representation of the world, particularly because Europe and other high-latitude regions appear larger than their actual relative size.
  • Critics argue that this can reinforce perceptions associated with the historical dominance of European powers and colonialism.
  • However, the distortion was primarily a consequence of the projection's mathematical purpose, rather than an explicit attempt to portray European territories as larger.

Search for Alternative Projections

  • James Gall (1855): Developed the Gall projection.
  • Arno Peters (1973): Popularised an equal-area projection that accurately represents relative areas but significantly distorts the shape of landmasses.
  • Arthur Robinson (1963): Developed the Robinson projection as a compromise projection, balancing distortions of size and shape.
  • Winkel Tripel (1921): Developed by German cartographer Oswald Winkel to reduce distortions in area, distance and direction.
  • The National Geographic Society adopted Winkel Tripel in 1998, replacing Robinson for its world maps; its use subsequently spread to schools, textbooks and institutions such as the World Bank.

Equal Earth Projection

  • Developed in 2018 by an international team of cartographers.
  • It is an equal-area projection, meaning the relative sizes of landmasses are represented accurately.
  • Its meridians curve towards the poles, producing some distortion of shape and distance.
  • It seeks to reduce the visual size imbalance created by Mercator, particularly for regions of the Global South.
  • It is considered particularly suitable for thematic and statistical data, where accurate comparison of land areas is important.

Which Projection Should Be Used?

PurposeSuitable ProjectionMain Advantage
NavigationMercator / conformalPreserves angles and compass directions
Population, climate, land-use dataEqual Earth / equal-areaPreserves relative areas
General world mapsRobinson / Winkel TripelBalances multiple distortions
Polar studiesAzimuthal/planarUseful for polar regions and central-point measurements